I am really touched by what clients have said about the service. A client wrote on 17 August 2011:
"Despite receiving legal advice from several solicitors about my claim, Adrian was the only person who I felt really understood my predicament. Adrian understood the subtext running through my grievance and how events had affected me, and was able to summarise my rather lengthy grievance very accurately.
Adrian placed the relevant information from my grievance very simply and elegantly within its legal context enabling me to understand clearly the strengths and weaknesses of my case. Several solicitors that I had been in touch with before contacting Adrian were much less effective at achieving this.
Adrian works with a very compassionate heart, and his approach to ethical business practice is inspirational. I cannot recommend Humane Resources highly enough."
- “I cannot even begin to thank you for all your effort and help with everything. If it wasn’t for you, I don’t know what I would have done, or how I would have coped. You truly are a very kind, humane and sincere person with a real kind heart who looks after people in trouble.”
- “Damn, you’re good! … The report is amazing … Thank you. For all you have done and for what you continue to do the words do not seem enough.”
- “The price I am paying in £ is insignificant to the price I nearly paid with my life. It is the best spent cash ever – even beats the Next sale, it has given me much more than words to give the opposition; it gave me back my self belief, and alongside the bully site and my therapy, gave me back my self esteem, confidence and empowered me with a knowledge that not only was it worth fighting, it was morally and personally right to do so.”
HH Mr Justice Burton, EAT president 2004
- “The Applicant … has handled the appeal before us himself, and has done so with conspicuous perspicacity, skill, patience and courtesy.
LJ Chadwick, Court of Appeal, 2005
- “Mr Melia has conducted his appeal in person, as he did before the Employment Appeal Tribunal. It is right to recognise, as I do, the skill with which he has done so. His written submissions demonstrate a well-researched appreciation of the relevant principles in this area of the law; and his oral submissions -- in a matter in which he is personally involved and in relation to which he is entitled to feel aggrieved -- have been moderate, sharply focused and concise.”